Sunday, February 19, 2012

Do-it-yourself drain care not for the faint of heart


I noticed recently that water was draining more and more slowly from our bathtub. I first thought this was a call for a highly corrosive, hydrochloric acid-based drain blaster, the ones that we all know to keep away from our eyes and all living things. But, since purchasing such an environmentally unfriendly product kept slipping my mind, I decided to unscrew the affixed tub plug and have a look down the drain. I am not sure what I expected to find.

In the dark hollows of the drain pipe, I could see foamy blockage. Since I was unable to get a really good look beyond the opening, I decided to straighten a clothes hanger, fashion it into a hook and plunge, then pull; a fishing expedition or sorts. What I succeeded in catching haunts my dreams.

The homemade hook caught solidly right away on something in the recesses of the drain pipe, so solidly that it took all my strength to jerk the wire loose. When it finally came loose, attached to its end appeared to be a soggy dead rodent.

What I caught wasn’t a dead rodent. What I caught in my bathtub drain had to be a decade’s accumulation of scum, lint, sand, particles of stuff unknown and hair. Lots and lots of slimy hair.

We have only owned this house seven years, so I am extra repulsed knowing I wrestled hair clogs left by people who owned the house before us. Strangers. Strangers who moved back to Australia, I was told by neighbors, though it would not matter where they went. I regret having to handle their hair balls.

After plunging a few more times with the homemade hook, and retrieving several smaller relatives of the initial soggy rodent, I recovered emotionally as much as possible and moved on to Phase Two of my drain clearing mission. I chose a method I learned from my father. I boiled a ten gallon pot full of water and poured it all in. I then replaced the plug and tested drain efficiency by turning on the spigot. The water raced away.

My deceased father, Bill Curle, was an innovative man. He designed contraptions and work-saving systems for fun. When I was a child, he routinely cleared our home drains by pouring the biggest pots of boiling water into them. This was a surefire method, he always boasted, of dissolving all that he said clogged drains most, such as soapy residue and oils from our skin. While his boiling water method seemed to keep our drains perky during my childhood, I do not recall my squeamish father getting to the real root of the drain problem as I did. I think he would be proud.

A generational tendency to take care of sluggish drains lives on, I suppose. I like to think of myself as innovative in the way my father was. I also like to think that a bent coat hanger and boiling water do not tax our environment the way corrosive drain cleaners do. Further, I believe that, just once in a while, we all need to be really grossed out. To that end, I share my story, complete with photos.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Rating students would create successful classroom mix


Substitute teaching is a recent addition to my long list of work experiences. Serving as an on-call educator for all grade levels in a public school district of a major city has been my own public education. Being a substitute teacher, with its rewards and pitfalls, has allowed me a firsthand look at classroom dynamics at all grade levels. What I now know about the challenges teachers face humbles me.

In any field, those who spend extended time are prone to a form of nearsightedness; the inability to see the forest for the trees. I know from my experiences in other industries that over time minds can become less porous, more resistant to new industry ideas. Sometimes a newcomer brings fresh perspective.

It would be easy at this point to join the current chorus and deem public education in the United States miserably broken. But, no. I am not educated enough or experienced enough to deem public education anything at all. Beyond my lack of qualifications, I lack the desire to castigate those who, I now know, care very much and try their damnedest to work within a system that bears little resemblance to modern day models of business success.

While many things about public education must be considered in brand new ways, from teacher training to teacher recruitment to teacher compensation, my fresh perspective tells me that students, too, must be considered in brand new ways if a successful, modern model for public education is ever to exist.

Students are not all alike. The teacher in Class A with twenty-five students and the teacher in Class B with twenty-five students do not, let me repeat, do not bear identical workloads because their student mixes are not identical. The expectation that the two teachers will take their identical headcounts to identical benchmarks of achievement is fallacy. Once this truth is embraced, the sacrosanct “teacher to student ratio” can be redefined and improved for the benefit of all.

I propose a system of categorizing students by demand units based on individual needs using a scale of one to five, with a rating of one-demand-unit being a student with a learning style that requires very little of a teacher’s energy and a rating of five-demand-units being a student requiring rigorous teacher management. Distribution of students by this rating system would result in classroom equity. While each teacher might be assigned thirty student units, that could mean thirty Category 1 students, or six Category 5 students, or any combination between.

Rating mainstream students based on needs would be new educational terrain. Supreme care would have to be taken to prevent judgments based on student ratings. The introduction of such a system to parents, educators and students would have to include promotion of the ratings as being merely an assessment of learning styles, no more judgmental than a personality quiz or career test. Category 1 students could not be held up as preferred, nor Category 5 students as problems in the classroom. Category 5 students, those talkative students who ask more questions and move about the room more, must be allowed pride in being assessed highly interactive. Steadfast Category 1 students should take pride, too, in their needs for more calm and solitude in a learning setting.

While my experiences are limited, I believe too many classrooms have too many Category 5 students and too many Category 1 students are overwhelmed. While most students are Categories 2 through 4, I feel certain that Category 1 students could thrive among dozens of students who share their learning styles and Category 5 students would do well together in smaller groups. The limits to human energy and time in a school day prohibit a teacher’s effectively advancing an improper mix of students.

Rate our students according to learning styles and watch test scores rise. Watch student and faculty satisfaction increase. Watch good teachers become great.